Doondi69 wrote:hmmmm would you not agree that MLK had a vested interest besides his alleged CL position?
This goes to my point to why I have to keep saying WHITE CLs. and to my point that even a racist so and so like Rommeny claim MLK - but at the same time hold a derisive theology of blacks.
Secondly, WHITE CLs are likely to vote for Obama over Ron Paulistas are just as likely to do so, to the same proportion they have historically attended MLK (that exemplary CL) Day parades. Or am I over reaching?
and finally and most importantly Dan may not be a racist but his position and his public statements will never prevent racist from feeling quite comfy in his company. The ML will ride in the wake of the CLs small government movement while the CL would never propose any legislation that would offend MLs senisbility... Again, white CL.
So I'm saying I think that Dan has left the door open for some nasties - just as Goldwater and Obama with the NDAA.
You are making mad generalisations here, ANY Civil libertarians can vote for Obama. Actually any Civil libertarians who vote for Obama are mad because Obama doesn't give two tosses about civil liberties.
Also saying that racists will feel quite comfy in Dans company is mad, Dan has stated many times that he is not a racist, and probably when pushed would decry racism as the ugly belief that it is. Saying that Dan has "left the door open for some nastiness" shows your lack of knowledge about the man.